Uh... Silver is crap! Red kills himself afterwards! Pfft. The originals are so much better.
I've concluded that you are, in fact, blind. Or flat out stupid.
I'm done. You have no response to anything.
Ah, but I honestly wouldn't have a problem if they kept it to themselves. You are creating a problem where there isn't one.
No, meth is just a drug. It harms nobody but the user. However, the ACTIONS should be punished, not the potential actions. Potentially, marriage could lead to abuse. That means all marriage is bad, right?
Right. Tell me where it says no law may be made based off a religion... Oh right, it doesn't.
Lemme say this one last time so your teensie little brain can comprehend it. That information didn't come from the website. Not even a little bit. You've also yet to describe HOW THAT'S BIASED, OR HOW TACITUS, PONTIUS PILATE, AND JOSEPHUS could be ignored. Just explain one single point instead of doing absolutely nothing. You've said exactly nothing relevant this entire time. I'm stunned for your pathetic attempt.
The website you linked said that since there's nothing outside of the Bible confirming it; (wrong) it didn't happen.
Just explain how the New Testament isn't historically biased. Oh and explain why you've neglected to address (don't bring up the website again, as this information doesn't relate to the website at all) Pontius Pilate, Tacitus, and Josephus.
(Ciara!!!): "If you have sex, you will die die die!" Nigahiga
Right. In lieu of a proper response, more insults.
Doesn't matter. That has absolutely nothing to do with Josephus, Tacitus, and Pontius Pilate.
Right. It's not certain, even though it happened... And you explicitly said it DIDN'T happen.
Ill say we're done. That information has A: nothing to do with the website, B: you haven't addressed it at all, and C: all you're doing is insulting me. That's kinda pathetic, dontcha think?
Actually, you ARE saying it didn't happen. You're saying it isn't true because there aren't other records. Do you know how illogical that is? You're an utter imbecile, you know that? Address my points, learn to debate, or get out of here and stop wasting my time.
Your spelling is nearly as bad as your argument.
Okay, so you condone children being blatantly lied to in textbooks? I dunno about you, but that's intolerable.
Secondly, I'm not qualified to do that. Could you do that for evolution? No. Don't ask for stuff you couldn't do. And if you CAN do that, do explain how the first living cell began... That's really a miracle.
It's fiction. You realize Darwin was just writing what he thought?
I don't know what you're talking about. Apparently you can't follow a simple chain of events.
Lolno. I'm talking about popular vote. You know that, right?
Let's say each state has a majority of well, 100. The popular vote votes to pass it, and in each of the 49 states, 100 more people vote yes than no. Follow me?
So that means, in the 49 states, 4900 more people approve of it. Right? Right. Then, in the last state, 5000 more people DISapproved of it than approved. That means, in the entire US, 100 more people disapprove than approve.
I don't know what kid of math you were doing...
All right... You're just too big of an imbecile to address my points. I don't know how you actually function in life, but I'm sure it's challenging.
IVE ASKED YOU FIVE TIMES TO ADDRESS TACITUS, PONTIUS PILATE, AND JOSEPHUS, AND YOU HAVE YET TO TALK OF THEM, instead you bring up some random thing from an equally random website.
You also never explained what makes the New Testament not historically accurate.
Oh, okay. So in a thousand years, suddenly I DIDN'T go to the store. I was unaware that time changed facts.
First off, that's false, they do present it as fact.
Secondly, in no way is creationism less scientific then evolutionism.
Third, uh... Are you saying it isn't fiction?
No, Josephus, pontius Pilate, Tacitus. They aren't. They are whom you have NEVER ADDRESSED.
Oh right sure, continue with the hypothetical situations.
Right. It could be. Even if I wrote in my personal journal that I did, if nobody else recorded it, I obviously didn't attend school. Or, maybe that is a bad example- the store. I write in my journal that I visited the grocery store with my mom to purchase eggs and Milk. There is no record that I entered the building, for maybe the cameras weren't working. I wrote it down, though. Now, what both you and he are saying, is that I DIDN'T go to the store because it isn't documented. That's the dumbest thing I ever heard.
Exactly. They're only taxed on their income, which could very well be nil.
Right, only, i don't really know what you mean by that.