Because they're successful.
If posts nowadays were something worth reading, I probably wouldn't have to question if this person was trolling or not.
Well, there are variables. Are we in a vacuum or no? If not, the ball of silk will undoubtedly be massive compared to the metal ball and have much more drag, resulting in a slower terminal velocity. There's also the consideration that even if we are in a vacuum, the added circumference of the silk ball will allow it to touch the ground first, even if the centers of the balls are lined up perfectly.
Any particular reason you're on this site? Since you seem to have a problem with things that don't have any productive use, I don't think you should be here. I also assume you don't listen to music, play games, watch movies, or entertain yourself in any way.
OH, I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you over the sound of being on the MOON.
People should get over themselves and learn to not take every negative comment up the butt...
Why yes, my alcoholism was caused by my hatred of babies.
What fid they fo?
I bet those people just laugh at your fallacious argument.
You are an awful person, and I will always respect you for this post.
Actually most people think abortion is wrong but think it's the woman's right. I think the WBC is wrong, but it's their right. It's the exact same thing.
There's a difference between supporting and encouraging. I support everyone's right to own a gun, but will I encourage everyone to shoot others? I support drug legalization, but will I encourage people to get high? I support everyone's right to take their own life, but do I encourage suicides? Nope. I support rights, but I don't necessarily encourage the action the rights protect.
Not having sex is causing someone not to live as well. Hell, not raping every woman you see is preventing someone from being born. Is that considered killing? Should I be arrested for not raping women?
Besides, the fetuses that are aborted are ones that would harm the gene pool anyways. People that get abortions are normally poor, uneducated women who had sex before they were ready without the proper protection. The children born to these women would likely become equally uneducated and poor due to both their family situation and, more importantly, to their genetics.
If you look at the situation completely objectively, you'll realize that the money needed to raise a child in a developed country could save more than one living child from starvation in a developing country. And these living children actually feel pain from their slow death. Of course, I realize that the money saved from not raising a child are definitely not sent to developing countries, but the point is the money needed to raise those children could be used for far better things.