Are you serious? You can't use a point as proof for a conclusion when the point you are using is the conclusion. Example: Aliens built the pyramids, they had to have built them, or else they wouldn't have been there!
Yes, but technically it would still be water, and it would still reach the sun because gravity would be pulling it towards the suns centre.
I am almost certain that shooting water at the sun would make it worse. The increase in water would increase it's mass, in return increasing the gravitational pull on the plasma. This would result in the sun increasing it's rate of fusion to maintain an equillibrium between gravity and the outwards radiation pressure, therefore releasing more energy and making the Earth hotter.
If the reality was completely created by your brain then you wouldn't really need to be that smart.
If there is no proof that something exists then it doesn't exist- logically speaking that is. The reason that the burden of proof falls to the believer is that only one simple thing needs to be proven in order to win the debate, they have to prove that God exists. The fact that one can't prove that He isn't real isn't proof that he is, while the fact that one can't prove that He is real is evidence that He isn't.
First cause argument: Everything has a cause, including the universe, so let's create an unobservable deity who- for some reason- doesn't need a cause, to explain how the universe was created instead of realising that by the laws of quantum mechanics it is perfectly plausible for the universe to exist without a cause.
I love the feeling of snatch on my tongue!
It is also completely unnecessary, as saying "Got to go" or "laugh out loud" takes tge same amount of energy as saying "G2G" or "LOL"
295 YYAs, and 0 NWs?! You are a hero!
There is also gun control in modern-day Canada, which was named the smartest country in the world in 2011. One single law doesn't define freedom
or democracy, it is a combination of rights, laws, and responsibilities that leads to democracy. I personally believe that guns are completely unnecessary for civillians to own, and America would be a much safer place without private firearms.
I don't think you understand what a Deathly Hallow is....
Time travel is something best explained using diagrams, speech, and potent hallucinogenic drugs.
What you said was logical, but it seemed somewhat circular when you were explaining it. I understood though.
Exactly, that is what I was arguing. Bringing a time machine back in the same reality would be impossible because of the paradoxes it would create.